Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGül, Alize Yaprak
dc.contributor.authorÇakmak, Emre
dc.contributor.authorKarakaş, Atiye Ece
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-19T10:13:56Z
dc.date.available2025-11-19T10:13:56Z
dc.date.issuedEkim 2025en_US
dc.identifier.citationGül, A. Y., Cakmak, E., & Karakas, A. E. (2024). Drone selection for forest surveillance and fire detection using interval valued neutrosophic edas method. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2335-0164
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12960/1789
dc.description.abstractForest fires are one of the major causes for deforestation resulting in significant economic and environmental losses. The application of drones has been extended to various areas including disaster management. Since drones offer numerous advantages like real-time surveillance, task planning capabilities and autonomy, they are utilized in early detection systems for forest fires. The selection of a drone type for this purpose involves a complex system of multiple factors and conflicting information, for which the use of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have been found to be yielding effective results. The aim of this study is to present a decision framework for drone selection problem in the context of forest fire surveillance and detection. This study contributes by (i) pointing out to the gap that the drone selection problem for forest surveillance and fire detection has been sparsely addressed, (ii) presenting an extensive literature review, (iii) extracting the relevant criteria through a literature review and interviews with the experts in field, (iv) assessing the alternatives by the proposed framework based on interval valued neutrosophic evaluation based on distance from average solution (IVN EDAS) method. The proposed framework is demonstrated by a case study consisting of four drone alternatives and 14 criteria. In accordance with the extant literature, the criteria related to the visual capabilities and diagnosis are evaluated as the most crucial features. A sensitivity analysis is carried out to check for the robustness by varying the criteria weights and a comparative analysis is conducted with interval valued neutrosophic technique for preference by similarity to the ideal solution (IVN TOPSIS) and interval valued neutrosophic combinative distance-based assessment (IVN CODAS) methods to validate the veracity of the method.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFacta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.22190/FUME231028008Gen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDrone selectionen_US
dc.subjectEDASen_US
dc.subjectFire detectionen_US
dc.subjectForest surveillanceen_US
dc.subjectInterval valued neutrosophic setsen_US
dc.subjectMCDMen_US
dc.titleDrone selection for forest surveillance and fire detection using interval valued neutrosophic edas methoden_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentMühendislik Fakültesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKarakaş, Atiye Ece
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage433en_US
dc.identifier.endpage458en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record