Advanced Search

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHou, Guoliang
dc.contributor.authorAli, Ali B.M.
dc.contributor.authorJasim, Dheyaa J.
dc.contributor.authorAhmadi, Gholamreza
dc.contributor.authorKhan, T.M. Yunus
dc.contributor.authorAbduvalieva, Dilsora
dc.contributor.authornikbakht-Naserabad, Sadegh
dc.contributor.authorSalahshour, Soheil
dc.contributor.authorSahramaneshi, Hani
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-24T06:35:08Z
dc.date.available2025-11-24T06:35:08Z
dc.date.issuedOcak 2026en_US
dc.identifier.citationHou, G., Ali, A. B., Jasim, D. J., Ahmadi, G., Khan, T. Y., Abduvalieva, D., ... & Sahramaneshi, H. (2026). Technical and thermodynamic impacts of heat recovery steam generator interior layout arrangement in the full repowering of an operating natural gas-fired steam power plant. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 170, 109966.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0735-1933
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12960/1803
dc.description.abstractThe present research paper investigates the technical and thermodynamic impacts of heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) interior layout arrangement in the full repowering of an operating 200 MW steam power plant. To do so, two main layouts are considered. In the first layout, a single HRSG and a 425 MW gas turbine (GT) are selected. In the second layout, two HRSGs and two GTs are investigated. In the case of using two HRSGs, different model GTs are used and examined. Single, double, and triple-pressure level HRSGs are tested in both layout arrangements. The impacts of pressure levels on how the new cycle performs and the negative results of implementing each case in repowered power plants are studied. Three new parameters are defined to evaluate the technical effect of each case. First, by assessing the impacts of each GT, the optimum one is determined, and then various effects of HRSG layout arrangement on the cycle performance are analyzed. The performance of the cooling tower, along with an existing steam turbine, mainly depends on HRSG pressure levels, particularly the number of pressure levels. This is why it is necessary to consider the performance of other components when determining the number of HRSG pressure levels. For the best efficiency while using two HRSGs, the GT model Siemens V84.3A is recommended. In this case, energy and exergy efficiencies increase to 58.5% and 57.57%, respectively. For the case of using one HRSG, using the GT model Siemens SGT5-8000H is highly advisable due to a 59.45 % and 57.41 % increase in energy and exergy efficiency, respectively.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Communications in Heat and Mass Transferen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.109966en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCombined cycle power planten_US
dc.subjectEfficiency improvementen_US
dc.subjectHRSGen_US
dc.subjectRepoweringen_US
dc.subjectSustainable developmenten_US
dc.subjectTechnical analysisen_US
dc.subjectThermal power plantsen_US
dc.titleTechnical and thermodynamic impacts of heat recovery steam generator interior layout arrangement in the full repowering of an operating natural gas-fired steam power planten_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentMühendislik Fakültesi, Bilişim Sistemleri Mühendisliğien_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorSalahshour, Soheil
dc.identifier.volume170en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record